• On MovieTome: Megan Fox on TRANSFORMERS 2!
July 24, 2008 4:55 PM PDT

Ford shows off 76 mpg Fiesta

Posted by Wayne Cunningham
  • Font size
  • Print

Ford Fiesta Econetic

The Ford Fiesta Econetic gets 76 mpg with a diesel engine.

(Credit: Ford)

Working hard to improve fuel economy, Ford showed off one result of its efforts at the British International auto show this week. The Ford Fiesta Econetic uses a 1.6-liter turbo diesel engine that gives it a combined fuel economy, under the EU test cycle, of 76.3 mpg.

Along with the diesel engine, the Fiesta Econetic has other tricks up its wheel well to achieve this fuel economy. Ford made aerodynamic changes to the standard Fiesta, such as adding rear air deflectors, lowering the suspensions, and putting the car on low rolling resistance tires. The engine uses low friction oil and the driver gets a shift light, indicating when its time to upshift for optimal fuel economy. The Econetic also keeps carbon dioxide emissions low, at 98 grams per kilometer.

Along with the new Fiesta Econetic, Ford makes Econetic versions of the Focus and Mondeo in the U.K. Ford won't offer a diesel version of the Fiesta when it comes to the U.S. in 2010.

Originally posted at The Car Tech blog
Recent posts from Crave
Let's pray French parking meters don't cross the pond
Getting hands-on with the Sony Vaio Lifestyle PC
Calexico, 'Absent Afternoon': Free MP3 of the Day
Sneak peek at the LG VX8360
Samsung LED monitor takes advantage
Ion's bevy of turntables and iPod accessories
Psyko 5.1 headset puts speakers where they've never been before
T-Mobile slide show
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 35 comments
by zahmbee July 24, 2008 5:28 PM PDT
OH my my my. Ford is doing something cool. I work at one of the other Detroit automakers and we're in deep trouble. We need to make a car like that.
Reply to this comment
by RyleeROBERTS July 24, 2008 7:38 PM PDT
I have read this many times at Ford News. I love this diesel-electric combination in a hybrid.The aesthetics look great. This is usually the first thing that people complain about with high mileage cars. I would certainly buy this if I were in the market for a new car.
Reply to this comment
by kanehi July 25, 2008 4:10 AM PDT
As any high-tech inventions the price would be on the expen$ive side which a lot of people cannot afford at these economic times. Might look nice on paper and reviews but the bottom line is will it be affordable?
Reply to this comment
by BioBeetle July 25, 2008 6:40 AM PDT
Great idea, failed execution! Here you have a proven 76mpg diesel but you won't sell it here in the US and you wonder why the US manufacturers are losing!

Look at the 2009 VW Jetta TDI there selling like hot cakes and it's expected that VW will sell every single one of them! I have a 98 New Beetle TDI (diesel) and I get 50mpg combined city and highway driving.

I feel sorry for the employees of GM, Ford, and Chrysler that they have to suffer for the lack of vision and leadership. If they fold they deserve it and I don't want any taxpayer dollars bailing them out!

BioBeetle
Reply to this comment
by bkhw77 July 25, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
This is not GM, Ford, and Chrysler lack of vision and leadership. Diesel cars are banned by EPA in this country. Our emission standards up to 40 times more restricted then EU. The reason:
more gas we spend - the taxes we pay...
by kockgunner July 27, 2008 8:15 PM PDT
haha exactly biobeetle. "wow, we have a car with 100 MPG but we're not going to release it in the US because we think there is no market for it." when will these numbskulls wake up and realise that environmentally friendly cars are on the rise and big cars are on their downfall? even if they do release it, it'll be 5 years after europe gets it. no wonder the american auto market is so behind. why are all these american car manufacturers going to do something for america?
by labazzo July 25, 2008 7:17 AM PDT
This is why I will not be buying American cars any more. tried to be loyal but Toyota has a 48mpg car that will likely be my next car. American auto makers are all hot air. They show off in other countries but fail to bring it home. They wonder why no one wants there cars any more. They are against our own country.
Reply to this comment
by joshdeboer July 25, 2008 7:46 AM PDT
Who is Ford? Three of my last four cars have been Honda.
Reply to this comment
by bigmc6000 July 25, 2008 7:48 AM PDT
Well that's nice and all but, umm, I hate to point this out but it still runs on gas... My next vehicle is going to be electric - I'm not going to buy another gasoline/diesel. So - GM/Ford - get to working on it or I will be forced to buy the sedan/light SUV that Tesla is working on right now...
Reply to this comment
by jharrisofkansas July 27, 2008 4:40 AM PDT
Why would you buy an all electric car? They pollute more per mile driven than gasoline powered cars.Unless you know for a fact each time you plug it in there is a hydroelectric power plant at the other end to supply power to your car.
by acdr92 July 27, 2008 10:31 AM PDT
guess where electricity comes from, thats right, from coal and oil powered plants.
by ltfred July 25, 2008 7:51 AM PDT
Your ignorance is sickening from this armchair qb comment section. The emission standards on diesel's in the US are completely different and thus hurting a lof of the benefit vs. the cost. Generalizations like yours further prove your ignorance.
Reply to this comment
by BioBeetle July 25, 2008 8:21 AM PDT
The ignorance comes for the the lack of knowledge in that diesel can be manufactured from various forms of crops that make vegetable oil. New research is showing that biodiesel can be extracted from various strains of algae. The algae extracts carbon and creates biodiesel. When burning biodiesel it is far less polluting that diesel made from crude oil. VW is meeting the standards as set by the EPA for new diesel emissions. So much so that they even meet CA standards, the toughest in the country.

By the way I take used vegetable oil and make my own biodiesel (B100) that fuels my car at around 70 cents a gallon. B100, and it's process if far less polluting and requires less energy to make than the boondoggle E85.

I'm not going to post any studies here as they are easy to find with a Google search. At least while I sit in my armchair I am intelligent enough to use technology to find facts and answers to educate myself before I open my mouth.

BioBeetle
Reply to this comment
by BioBeetle July 25, 2008 8:29 AM PDT
Ok there is one URL I will point you from the RAND Corporation study comparing diesel, hybrid, and gas. Guess who came out on top across the board?!

http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/11/08/index1.html

Please educate yourself!

BioBeetle
Reply to this comment
by Benf July 25, 2008 8:41 AM PDT
Remember, the electricty usec to charge that "Electric" car" probably comes from a "oil Fired Power Plant", alternate fuel and electric cars are so expensive that the average american cant afford em so only the above average wage earner can afford to buy one, if the vast majority cant afford these ecologicaly friendly cars then where's the enviromental benefit?
Reply to this comment
by jnkyd July 25, 2008 9:40 AM PDT
I think you answered your own question. When a "vast majority" of people cannot afford to drive, there are huge environmental benefits.
by Stevhov1 July 25, 2008 9:17 AM PDT
by ltfred - "Generalizations like yours further prove your ignorance."


Says the man who is making a general statement about an entire thread of comments. :)
Reply to this comment
by texasags July 25, 2008 10:20 AM PDT
Is that 76 miles per U.S. gallon? Remember, the gallon in Europe is larger than ours (1 Imperial gallon = 1.2 U.S. gallons). Either way, it's impressive.
Reply to this comment
by ktwbc November 21, 2008 10:30 AM PST
It's UK gallons. Technically this car uses 3.7L/100km (that's 3.7 litres of gas per 100 kilometers driven), which in US Gallons is 63.57mpg
by dcomputer9 July 25, 2008 11:21 AM PDT
I wish I could get a job with Ford to show them how they are going down hill. The diesel may also not be a great idea since fuel costs in the USA for diesel are higher than Super gasoline. I would not buy a US auto in the next 10 years and this is why Ford and GM are going to hit the bottom while foreign auto makers will keep hitting high. I think that the technology is there but using it is taking them 9 years.
Reply to this comment
by BioBeetle July 25, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
The problem is that the US auto makers have invested so heavily in SUV's and trucks that making the switch is going to cost them. But yet they sell the same models in Europe with diesel options that get better fuel economy.

For example, we have a 05 Dodge Grand Caravan as our family hauler. It gets 26mpg highway and maybe 20mpg city. But yet the same model is sold in Europe with a diesel option that gets nearly 40mpg! Had I had the option of getting the diesel I would have.

No for those of you that only see the price per gallon between gas and diesel your missing the whole picture. My real world example:

02 Dodge Neon 32mpg (highway) x 10 gallons = 320 miles per tank. Multiple that 10 gallons by $4 = $40

98 TDI Beetle 50mpg (highway) x 10 gallons = 500 miles on 10 gallons. Multiple that by $4.69 = $46.90

In order for the Neon to get the same mileage would cost me another $48! (500-320= 180/10 = 8 gallons x $4 =$48) Yearly savings, for me, $2,496.

BioBeetle
Reply to this comment
by THEDOVEY July 25, 2008 4:47 PM PDT
BIODEETLE,

I THINK THAT YOU HAVE TO DIVIDE THE 180 MILES BY 32 MPG TO GET THE SAVINGS.


BIGTOM
by hey_frind July 27, 2008 11:42 AM PDT
Small correction Biobeetle, your cost for neon to get the same mileage as the beetle, it costs $22.5 instead of 48! (180/32 = 5.65gal, required for 180 miles and 5.625 X $4 = 22.5) ofcouse it'd result in a savings of $811 instead of $2496. - Just to ease you up...may be you are not loosing that much money as expected.
by bricar2 July 25, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
That's a great idea to have a car with such a high MPG. Say you're a car manufacturer and you have that one in your fleet. You could meet the looming 35 MPG CAFE standards and still sell the other cars everybody really wants to be seen driving. Maybe these tiny-wheeled cars will save sports cars after all? One can only hope.
Reply to this comment
by brianbot5000 July 25, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
Another great car that Ford won't sell here. Why are we stuck with the gas-only version? Clean diesel technology has come far enough so that most car companies can make diesel versions that WILL pass US emissions standards.

Ford, you're making great cars, you're just not selling them in the US. Until then, F off.
Reply to this comment
by rrod182 July 25, 2008 12:17 PM PDT
Can you say gimmick. Ford is weak. Diesel gets 8 - 20% better fuel economy anyway. It costs more, despite basically being industrial waste. On top of that its a manual transmission? Can't a computer automagically **** more accurately than I?

BTW RAND is pwned by Big Oil and Weapons lobbyists.
Reply to this comment
by submariner88 July 25, 2008 12:17 PM PDT
blah blah blah, the technology is already there, let's start making these vehicles already
Reply to this comment
by jabailo July 25, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
Does it use Start-Stop technology? (No idling).
Reply to this comment
 See all 35 Comments >>
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

In the news now

Yahoo's Decker strong contender for CEO

Sources say the president of the embattled Internet search pioneer has been through two rounds of interviews with the board.


Gadget extravaganza in Las Vegas

CES 2009 is in full swing. Highlights so far include Palm's WebOS and Pre device, Microsoft's Windows 7 beta, and much more.


advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
-->