• On CHOW: How to chill beer right
December 4, 2008 7:50 AM PST

Virgin America offers consumer carbon offsets

Posted by Candace Lombardi
  • Font size
  • Print

(Credit: Virgin America)

Virgin America announced Thursday it will offer customers the option to pay a voluntary fee when booking their ticket, which will go toward supporting carbon offset projects.

The U.S. domestic airline based in California, of which Richard Branson's Virgin Group is a minority share investor, has partnered with Carbonfund.org on the effort.

Through Carbonfund.org, the money Virgin America collects from consumers will be directed toward projects sanctioned by the Environmental Defense Fund's (EDF) official CarbonOffsetList.org.

One of the projects from that list that Virgin America chose to support, for example, is IdleAire.

IdleAire lets truckers connect their cabins to electricity sources at rest stops, rather than keep their engines idling to keep their power on. The process saves each trucker about a gallon of diesel per hour, according to Virgin America.

While IdleAire sounds like a practical project, it's questionable whether consumers will go for it.

Many other airlines have tried offering carbon offsets with lackluster results. Virgin Atlantic, admitting its online option wasn't getting many takers, announced last year it would try guilt by offering an offset in the air alongside the drinks.

Consumers could get nitpicky about each individual project. Donating to IdleAire sounds fine, but where is that electricity the truckers' tap into coming from? Is the local electricity being used generated from a renewable resource or coal?

There's also the world food shortage, and many poverty and disease-fighting nonprofits struggling from a lack of available charity due to the tough economy. Consumers might place environmental causes at the bottom of their charity list if they themselves are limited to what they can give this year.

Then, again, it's been argued that some water and food shortages can be directly linked to environmental changes in those problem areas. Will consumers feel there's a long view to be seen and donate toward offsetting pollution with that hope of improving things down the road?

Perhaps more promising is the second tact Virgin American plans to take.

While it's not in place yet, the airline plans to offer an onboard option. Through the touch-screen televisions on their flights, consumers will have a second chance to donate once their flight is already in the air.

Will a view of the clouds (and the occasional smog ruining skyline views) shame the guilty into donating? I'm just not sure.

After all, with Virgin America's new Gogo in-flight Wi-Fi service, consumers could just as easily donate online to another cause if they're feeling charitable while airborne.

Candace Lombardi is a journalist who divides her time between the U.S. and the U.K. Whether it's cars, robots, personal gadgets, or industrial machines, she enjoys examining the moving parts that keep our world rotating. Email her at CandaceLombardi@gmail.com. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Green gadgets get middling report card at CES
Green news harvest: Exxon CEO calls for carbon tax
Obama's stimulus plan: The energy debate
Positive Energy sheds light on home energy
Smart grid companies want stimulus cash from feds
Termite stomach bug to make ethanol
Cree wins contract to light the Pentagon
Energy monitor sees $7.5 million in funding round
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 9 comments
by William Crow December 4, 2008 9:13 AM PST
Why would they do this? Its nonsense.
Reply to this comment
by Joe Real December 4, 2008 10:35 AM PST
This is going to be the top scams of the new era. It is nothing but a ploy to take advantage of the carbon guilt of some of the environmentally conscientious people who cannot forego the convenience of their current lifestyles. Carbon offsets will not remove your guilt but will surely enrich the con-artists and scammers running behind the carbon-offset operations.

To run the carbon offset operations honestly, there would be multitudes of auditors, bean counters, and third party validators, the price of which will produce more carbon in the process. This is a losing project for the rest of us.
Reply to this comment
by ScottKC December 4, 2008 11:56 AM PST
I've bought carbon offsets before and think it's needed where one can't easily lower one's carbon footprint, such as flying or driving. Offset dollars are going into real projects as the EDF project listing shows. These projects are needed especially when our government hasn't acted on global warming in any consistent manner. Here's a company that's trying something even in this tough economy. We shouldn't let our cynicism overcome the need to do something about global warming.
Reply to this comment
by Joe Real December 4, 2008 12:36 PM PST
Listings are one thing, and so are the blahs-blahs that wasted time doing no real work. Validated projects by independent third party credible scientists are another, and still another if the scientific analysis and papers produced from the real projects have been internationally critiqued or refereed by their peers would be convincing. No projects that I know in the carbon offset have passed such criteria. And if there are, they should show the audit trail of money where it went, chances are, more than 90% of it went to administrators and auditors.
by gggg sssss December 4, 2008 4:27 PM PST
Why would any sane person give any money to these scams? Even Al Gore is on the take with this. If you really care, curtail the activities that produce GHG. Everything else is just plain crap.Do you see the chinese coal fired power plants engaging in this stupidity?
Reply to this comment
by icfdude December 5, 2008 6:07 AM PST
Carbon "Indulgence".
Reply to this comment
by ScottKC December 5, 2008 7:57 AM PST
Carbon offsetting isn't an indulgence or a guilt-reliever-- it's doing something on global warming, and if a respected organization like EDF backs up carbon offsetting, carbon offsetting should be taken seriously as an approach in ending global warming. As I said, I've bought carbon offsets. If you haven't already, you should look at the facts on carbon offsetting.
Reply to this comment
by Joe Real December 5, 2008 8:50 AM PST
Need independent review and audits on the EDF activities. Very interested in how much are spent on field projects and how much money went to administration, oversight, and management.
by ScottKC December 6, 2008 5:25 PM PST
Offsetting is a good thing. Until the world's governments put more emphasis on global warming, including the U.S., offsetting is needed as a practical approach in ending global warming. Doing nothing is not the answer, and certainly offsetting can be complemented by other approaches. It's one of the tools, but a needed one.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Yahoo's Decker strong contender for CEO

Google has revealed its goal for releasing Mac OS X and Linux versions of its browser. Also, cutting-edge Chrome sports early work to enable extensions.


Amazon, Apple and the price of music

Record labels aren't cutting deals, sources say. If downloads are cheaper on Amazon than iTunes, then they're likely a loss leader.


Gadget extravaganza in Las Vegas

CES 2009 is in full swing. Highlights so far include Palm's WebOS and Pre device, Microsoft's Windows 7 beta, and much more.


About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right