<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>












<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <link>http://news.cnet.com/8300-13580_3-39.html</link>
        <title>Underexposed   </title>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <description>Stephen Shankland covers digital photography, science, and open-source.</description>
        
        <copyright>2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved</copyright>
        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:03:00 PST</pubDate>
        





    
        
    

    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
    




    

    


            <item>
                <title>Canon fix looks good for SLR&#039;s &#039;black dot&#039; glitch</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10136055-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<p>
<i>Updated at 8:25 p.m. PST with preliminary test results, and at 10:36 p.m. PST with another photographer's results.</i>
</p><p>
Canon on Wednesday released new firmware for its EOS 5D Mark II camera that the company said "improves and mitigates" the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10126868-39.html">"black dot" problem</a> that marred some images from the high-profile, high-end SLR.
</p><p>
<a href="http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/firm-e/eos5dmk2/firmware.html">Version 1.0.7 of the 5D Mark II firmware</a> software is downloadable from Canon's Web site. (I encountered some dead ends on the site, but eventually found the 9MB download on the U.S. site at <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&tabact=DownloadDetailTabAct&fcategoryid=314&modelid=17662">this address</a>.)
</p><p>
I've just run some tests. My preliminary opinion is that there's grounds for optimism that the firmware indeed seems to have taken care of the problem. See the shots below taken at ISO 800 and 3,200, magnified to three times regular size.
</p>
<div class="cnet-image-div image-regular float-none" style="width: 494px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090107/5DII_black_dot_fix_ISO800.jpg" alt="This scene of San Francisco by night, taken with a 5D Mark II using the new version 1.0.7 firmware, shows no evidence of the black dot problem." width="494" height="193" /><p class="image-caption">This scene of San Francisco by night, taken with a 5D Mark II using the new version 1.0.7 firmware, shows no evidence of the black dot problem.</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)</span></div>
...]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10136055-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:03:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    

    
        
    

    
        
    

    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
    




    

    

    

    


            <item>
                <title>iPhoto update helps show merits of geotagging</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10133310-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<p>
With its launch of iPhoto 09, Apple has begun showing some reasons why it's worth enduring the hassle of geotagging your photos.
</p><p>
It's generally <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9784487-39.html">not easy right now to label your photos with information about where you took the pictures</a>--the process usually is done with special software to marry the photos with location data taken from a separate GPS receiver. 
</p>


<div class="cnet-image-div image-medium float-left" style="width: 270px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090106/_MG_6064_270x404.JPG" alt="" width="270" height="404" /><p class="image-caption">Phil Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, demonstrated geotagging in iPhoto 09 at Macworld 2009.</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: James Martin/CNET Networks)</span></div>


<p>
Phil Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, demonstrated what you can do with iPhoto at the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10131491-37.html">Macworld 2009 keynote</a> Tuesday.
</p>

<p>
iPhoto 09 works best with photos that already have been tagged. That's getting more common, as GPS hardware support becomes less of a rarity. For example, Nikon's Coolpix P6000 has a built-in GPS receiver, and Nikon has begun selling its GP-1 GPS receiver, which can plug into its SLR's flash mount so location data is embedded in the photo. Apple's iPhone can geotag its own photos, and camera manufacturers say GPS support in cameras has become a matter of when, not if.
</p><p>
But the software also can help you tag your own images. Clicking a photo flips it over, letting you type in a location, then showing the spot using a map. (Google supplies back-end mapping services). Helpfully, iPhoto then can spread that location data to other photos with similar time stamps, and they can be bundled together into a group called an event.
</p><p>
<b>OK, but what can you do?</b><br />
Once you have geotagged photos, what can you do with them?
</p><p>
For one thing, sift through them geographically using iPhotos' new Places interface. Viewing an iPhoto event can show an associated collection of pushpins on a map, and clicking each pin shows the photo.
</p><p>
For another, you can search for photos based on where you took them, not on whatever filing system you might use. iPhoto can handle geographic hierarchies, so if you labeled a photo with "Eiffel Tower," it'll find it with a search for "France" or "Paris."
</p>

...]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10133310-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:04:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    

    
        
    

    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
            
        
    




    

    

    


            <item>
                <title>Google to release Picasa beta for Mac</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10130075-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<div class="cnet-image-div image-regular float-none" style="width: 614px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20081231/picasa_mac_collage2_smaller.jpg" alt="Picasa for Mac OS X" width="614" height="459" /><p class="image-caption">Picasa for the Mac includes the ability to make collages and other core features.</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: Google)</span></div>

<p><span style="float:right; margin-left:4px; margin-bottom:4px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/Google_to_Release_Picasa_Beta_for_Mac';</script><script src='http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js'></script></span></p>

<p>
Google plans to release on Monday a beta version of Picasa for Mac OS X, helping Apple fans catch up to Windows and Linux users already employing the free tool for editing, cataloging, and uploading photos.
</p><p>
The Mac version largely matches the features in <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10026577-39.html">Picasa 3 for Windows</a>, said Jason Cook, Picasa's marketing manager. Though the company has been scrambling to include some secondary features such as geotagging and the ability to get photos printed, the core abilities of Picasa are present, he said.
</p><p>
Picasa lets people edit and print photos, create collages and movies, and add labels, star ratings, and tags. More significantly, given Google's cloud-computing focus, it also lets people upload their images to the company's online Picasa Web Albums site where images can be shared. Google acquired Picasa in 2004.
</p><p>
"We have many Mac users," Cook said, though declining to offer any estimates, "and we think they'll be excited about this. It makes the Picasa Web Albums experience better."
</p>

...]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10130075-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:00:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
    




    

    


            <item>
                <title>Need an SLR for traveling? Props to Olympus E-3</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10117902-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<div class="cnet-image-div image-custom float-right" style="width: 250px;" ><a href="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090104/E-3_revu_(2).jpg" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090104/E-3_revu_(2)_250x352.jpg" alt="The 55-200mm lens brought me close to this owl in Patagonian Chile, who obligingly didn&amp;#39;t spook when I stopped and changed lenses." width="250" height="352" /></a><p class="image-caption">The 55-200mm lens brought me close to this owl in Patagonian Chile, who obligingly didn&#39;t spook when I stopped and changed lenses. (Click to enlarge.)</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)</span></div>

<p>
Here's a frustrating combination: traveling and serious photography. At precisely the time you want to photography interesting new surroundings, you also don't want to be burdened with inordinate amounts of gear.
</p><p>
Olympus has one interesting answer to the conundrum, though: the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/olympus-e-3-with/4505-6501_7-32774497.html">E-3 (click here for CNET's full-on review)</a>. Its top-of the line SLR is rugged, waterproof, and when combined with the company's Zuiko Digital ED 12-60mm F2.8-4.0 SWD and 50-200mm F2.8-3.5 SWD lenses provides a flexible package that's portable if not actually lightweight.
</p><p>
I hauled the E-3 with those lenses and the Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F4.0 wide-angle zoom to Argentina for a month of vacation and was pleased with the performance. I had to lug the gear not only on the usual buses and city tours, but also in much more demanding conditions: two four-day backpacking trips with a three-year-old, Patagonia's uncertain weather, and serious weight-carrying constraints.
</p><p>
The result was good photos of people, flower close-ups, skittish wildlife, and beautiful mountains.
</p><p>
The gear costs about $1,950 for the camera and 12-60mm lens, $950 for the 50-200mm lens, and $1,400 for the 7-14mm lens.
</p>

...]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10117902-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:30:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
            
        
    




    

    

    


            <item>
                <title>A computer revolution through a child&#039;s eyes</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10128407-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<p>
I have proof from an expert that the iPhone interface really is better. Who's the expert? My 3-year-old son.
</p><p>
Over the years, I've seen countless newbies struggle to use the latest gadget, computer, or software. I like new technology, but it's been work hauling myself up learning ...</p>]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10128407-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:00:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
            
        
    




    

    

    

    

    


            <item>
                <title>iPhone claims high-ranking spot on Flickr</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10128538-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<div class="cnet-image-div image-regular float-none" style="width: 614px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20081223/iphone_slr_flickr_chart_sm.png" alt="The iPhone has risen to prominence on Flickr, rivaling most SLRs in popularity." width="614" height="253" /><p class="image-caption">The iPhone has risen to prominence on Flickr, rivaling most SLRs in popularity. These statistics from Yahoo cover the last 12 months.</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: Yahoo)</span></div>

<p><span style="float:right; margin-left:4px; margin-bottom:4px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/iPhone_claims_high_ranking_spot_on_Flickr';</script><script src='http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js'></script></span></p>

<p>
The <a href="http://www.cnet.com/apple-iphone.html">iPhone</a> is the mobile device of choice these days for doing most things that need a network. So it ...</p>]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10128538-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:54:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
    




    
        
    

    


            <item>
                <title>&#039;Tis the season to Crave: Stephen Shankland&#039;s picks</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10126673-1.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<p><b>Editor's note: From now through the end of December, various Crave experts will be sharing their top five (mostly) tech-related wishes for the holiday season. See what we crave, and maybe you'll get some ideas!</b></p>  
<p>
I'll be honest. What I want is <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=154&modelid=7318">Canon's EF 500mm f/4L IS USM</a> telephoto lens, but it costs $5,600, so let's move on to some options that aren't quite so detached from economic reality for a mostly amateur photographer such as myself.
</p><p>
Obviously my camera is a Canon SLR, but I'm reasonably happy with my setup right now, so here are some items I covet that are more modestly priced and that happen to be neutral as regards camera manufacturer.
</p><p>
<div class="cnet-image-div image-regular float-left" style="width: 236px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20081218/whibal_keychain.jpg" alt="WhiBal cad" width="236" height="96" /><p class="image-caption">RawWorkflow.com&#39;s WhiBal white-balance card</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: RawWorkflow.com)</span></div>
</p><p>
<b>1. <a href="http://www.rawworkflow.com/whibal/">WhiBal white-balance card</a></b>. I shoot raw images, which means data is taken directly from the camera's image sensor without any in-camera processing. I like it because it gives me more flexibility for matters such as exposure adjustment. Second in importance to exposure, though, is fixing white balance--for example the orangey color cast you'll often see when shooting under incandescent lights or the bluish tinge of pictures in the shade. 
</p><p> 
The flip side of raw photography is that it's more manual labor than just grabbing the JPEG, but to me it's worth it. I mostly just eyeball the white balance, but sometimes keying off parts of an image--the whites of someone's eyes or gray and black clothing--gives an easier way to set white balance with software. But for more precision, the <a href="http://www.rawworkflow.com/whibal/">WhiBal</a> cards from RawWorkflow.com give an easy way to be more rigorous. You take a photo of the durable card, which shows a standard 18 percent gray, then set the white balance in software off that part of the photo. With modern raw-image editing software, you can synchronize the white balance for a series of images off the one you took with the card. The $19 keychain model looks about my speed.
... <p>Originally posted at <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10126673-1.html" class="origPostedBlog">Crave</a></p>]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10126673-1.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:00:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    
        
    

    
        
    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
    




    

    


            <item>
                <title>FixMyMovie forsakes the cloud for PC software</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10127350-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<div class="cnet-image-div image-regular float-none" style="width: 604px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20081219/motiondsp_12.19.2008.jpg" alt="MotionDSP&amp;#39;s technology combines data from multiple video frames to reduce jerkiness, reduce noise, and increase resolution." width="604" height="202" /><p class="image-caption">MotionDSP&#39;s technology combines data from multiple video frames to reduce jerkiness, reduce noise, and increase resolution.</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: MotionDSP)</span></div>
<p>
<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9856721-39.html">FixMyMovie</a>,  an online service that let people improve the quality of their videos, is going offline.
</p><p>
"We're shutting down FixMyMovie.com on December 31, 2008. In its place, we'...</p>]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10127350-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:18:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
    




    


            <item>
                <title>Fraud case leads Polaroid to bankruptcy protection</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10127289-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<p>
Polaroid filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Friday, but no, it's not because <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9867913-39.html">almost nobody wants its self-developing film anymore</a>.
</p>
<div class="cnet-image-div image-regular float-right" style="width: 215px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20081219/polaroid_logo.jpg" alt="" width="215" height="55" /></div>
<p>
Instead, the company said that its filing, which permits the company to undertake a financial restructuring, is related to a fraud matter involving Petters Group Worldwide, owner of ...</p>]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10127289-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:09:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        





    
        
    

    
        
    

    
        
    


        
            
                
                
            
        
            
        
            
        
    




    

    

    


            <item>
                <title>Apple software supports 5D Mark II camera</title>
                <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10127018-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
                <description>
                    
                            <![CDATA[<div class="cnet-image-div image-regular float-right" style="width: 333px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20081219/Canon_5DII_rly_small.jpg" alt="Canon&amp;#39;s 5D Mark II full-frame SLR" width="333" height="299" /><p class="image-caption">Canon&#39;s 5D Mark II full-frame SLR</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: Canon)</span></div>
<p>
Apple has added support for raw photo files from <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10126868-39.html">Canon's vaunted if imperfect 5D Mark II</a> to its Aperture 2 and iPhoto 08 software less than a week after rival <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10123969-39.html">Adobe did so with Lightroom</a>.
</p><p>
The <a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/Digital_Camera_Raw_Compatibility_Update_2_4">Digital Camera Raw Compatibility Update 2.4</a> ...</p>]]>
                        
                </description>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-10127018-39.html</guid>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:46:00 PST</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Shankland</dc:creator>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
